Top Stores

  • Konto gelöscht
    Konto gelöscht

    0 Beiträge

    Vereinigtes Königreich

    Die Informationen sind nicht mehr verfügbar, da das Konto dieses Benutzers gelöscht wird (DSGVO-Grundverordnung).
  • moonstone

    1047 Beiträge

    Vereinigtes Königreich

    You would have to assume others sold less than nothing :) :)

    Seriously, in the way I think they do the calculation, I imagine someone else has added to the 'Other Collections' element of their store, and not sold anything ( or very little), thus making their items sold as a % of their items available for sale less than yours.

    This might be totally wrong, but then again, as I have often said before, the calculation is a mystery to all mankind. ;)
  • Konto gelöscht
    Konto gelöscht

    0 Beiträge

    Vereinigtes Königreich

    You would have to assume others sold less than nothing :) :)

    Seriously, in the way I think they do the calculation, I imagine someone else has added to the 'Other Collections' element of their store, and not sold anything ( or very little), thus making their items sold as a % of their items available for sale less than yours.

    This might be totally wrong, but then again, as I have often said before, the calculation is a mystery to all mankind. ;)
    • Erstellt am 12.02.2018 um 06:36
    • #823097
    Die Informationen sind nicht mehr verfügbar, da das Konto dieses Benutzers gelöscht wird (DSGVO-Grundverordnung).
  • moonstone

    1047 Beiträge

    Vereinigtes Königreich

    Ah, apologies, I hadn't noticed that you weren't listed at all the previous week - perhaps you have gone up 1 place from sometime in the past when you last had something in this category? :dunno: :dunno:
  • xpto1963

    3 Beiträge

    Portugal

  • tris_nerima

    473 Beiträge

    Kanada

    I have always had a real dislike for the system for calculating the ratings.To me a top store should reflect the total value of sales in a month,regardless of how many items are listed. I suppose a seller who has 1 item and sells it should be the top seller????
    I just ignore the ratings...they are totally misleading for buyers.
  • mjocovers

    474 Beiträge

    Vereinigtes Königreich

    I have always had a real dislike for the system for calculating the ratings.To me a top store should reflect the total value of sales in a month,regardless of how many items are listed. I suppose a seller who has 1 item and sells it should be the top seller????
    I just ignore the ratings...they are totally misleading for buyers.
    • Erstellt am 15.02.2018 um 16:36
    • #824813
    I'm confused, are you saying someone who has 1000 items listed & only sells 1 item (for £200) should be ranked higher than someone who has 1000 items listed & sells 199 items (for £1 each)?
  • tris_nerima

    473 Beiträge

    Kanada

    I'm confused, are you saying someone who has 1000 items listed & only sells 1 item (for £200) should be ranked higher than someone who has 1000 items listed & sells 199 items (for £1 each)?
    • Erstellt am 15.02.2018 um 18:35
    • #824840
    As far as I know the rating is based on a percentage of items for sale and the amount of items sold.If you check the number of items sold in a 1 month period of some of the sellers in the 20th to 10th rankings you will be amazed how little the sales are.But because they have a small number of listings they can receive a higher ranking.My ranking is around 40th yet I outsell a lot more sellers ranked higher.Because I have more listings my ranking stays lower.The formula used does not give a true picture of top stores/sellers.
  • Konto gelöscht
    Konto gelöscht

    0 Beiträge

    Vereinigtes Königreich

    Die Informationen sind nicht mehr verfügbar, da das Konto dieses Benutzers gelöscht wird (DSGVO-Grundverordnung).