is this stamp genuine

  • Compte supprimé
    Compte supprimé

    0 message

    Royaume-Uni

    Les informations ne sont plus disponibles car le compte de cet utilisateur est supprimé (Règlement RGPD)
  • phillegrec

    2911 messages

    Suisse

    Les informations ne sont plus disponibles car le compte de cet utilisateur est supprimé (Règlement RGPD)
    • Posté le 6 août 2010 à 17:03
    • #292928
    Hello Stampprob,
    My name is Phil and I am mostly on the french forum but I can help you with my little english.
    With your stamp you should see my scan and after look at your stamp on the shield. If it is a little shield as the first shield on my scan it is guenine because the stamp has no perforation and on the other side with a big shield your stamp had have its perforation removed.
    On the scan, the little shield is on the left and the big one is on the right.

    I hope I have helped you and have nice holydays and day.:applause:

    Phil
  • grotekers

    245 messages

    Pays-Bas

    Les informations ne sont plus disponibles car le compte de cet utilisateur est supprimé (Règlement RGPD)
    • Posté le 6 août 2010 à 17:03
    • #292928
    Hello Stampsprob,

    Greetings from the Netherlands. :cool:The answer of Phillegrec is in my opinion not correct. The stamp with the small brustshield (MichelNr 4) has perforation too and well K 13½:14¼ according to the Michelcatalogue.

    Stamps of 1 Groschen without perforation are not mentioned.

    I think your item with no perforation is a cut-off of the envelope of 1 Groschen who has the same image as the stamp. In that case there would be a little repetiting print EIN GROSCHEN through the image.

    Regards
    Grotekers :beer:


  • phillegrec

    2911 messages

    Suisse

    Hello Stampsprob,

    Greetings from the Netherlands. :cool:The answer of Phillegrec is in my opinion not correct. The stamp with the small brustshield (MichelNr 4) has perforation too and well K 13½:14¼ according to the Michelcatalogue.

    Stamps of 1 Groschen without perforation are not mentioned.

    I think your item with no perforation is a cut-off of the envelope of 1 Groschen who has the same image as the stamp. In that case there would be a little repetiting print EIN GROSCHEN through the image.

    Regards
    Grotekers :beer:


    • Posté le 9 août 2010 à 13:22
    • #293181
    Dear Stampsprob and Groteker,
    Groteker has wright and I am sorry about my mistake.
    All those stamps have perforation as Groteker said and no one have not. I had misreading my book and was disturbed.
    Your stamp have been cut as it was often made at those times.

    I am very sorry.

    Phil